- Paul Allen: Microsoft co-founder and billionaire dies aged 65
- Asia stocks at 17-month low as China lets yuan slip
- UK announces $22.25m support for Rohingya refugees
- IMF forecasts 7.1pc economic growth for Bangladesh in 2019
- Bangladesh ‘least committed’ to cut rich-poor gap: Oxfam
- Bhashani Univ suspends 5 BCL leaders ‘for misbehaving with teachers’
- NKorea hackers broke into banks, tried to take US$1.1b
- Oil spill threatens Meghna; unheeded for 5 days
- Haiti quake death toll rises to 15, and 300 injured
- PM Sheikh Hasina donates Tk 50 lakh for Prof MahbubÕs treatment
Journalists' concerns over Digital Security Bill to be placed before cabinet Monday
Concerns expressed by journalists' including newspaper editors, over the recently passed Digital Security Bill is likely to be placed before the weekly cabinet meeting for discussion today.
I have given words to them [journalists] and will keep that, law minister Anisul Huq told New Age on Sunday when asked if he would place journalists' concerns over the bill before the cabinet meeting this morning.
Anisul Huq assured that he would discuss the matter at the meeting.
After separate meetings with Editors Council and journalist bodies at secretariat on September 30, law minister Anisul Huq and information minister Hasanul Haq Inu in presence of posts, telecommunications, and information technology minister Mostafa Jabbar, assured that they would place the journalists concerns before the cabinet.
The ministers said that they would again talk to Editors Council and others journalist bodies after th discussion in the cabinet.
The Digital Security Bill reached Bangabhaban on October 4 for the assent of president Md Abdul Hamid.
Jatiya Sangsad on September 19 passed the bill ignoring concerns expressed by different national and international quarters, including European Union and journalists at home and abroad. Parliament secretariat on October 4 forwarded the bill to the president for his assent.
Left democratic alliance, a combine of eight left leaning political parties on October 3 urged the president not to assent to the bill and send it back to parliament for revision terming the bill repressive.
Committee to Protect Journalists' urged the president to return the bill to parliament for revision.
Transparency International Bangladesh also made a similar call on the president from a programme in Dhaka on September 26.
The bill was tabled in parliament on April 9 creating concerns among journalists and rights activists that freedom of the press and expression would be seriously jeopardised if the bill was passed.
The bill caused huge protests from freethinkers and media people.
Journalists, national and international rights groups, academics and freethinkers demanded changes to the bill saying it would gag the freedom of press and expression. They also said that it would be misused against media people, critics and freethinkers as similar provisions stipulated in the Section 57 of the Information and Communication Technology Act were misused.
Newspaper editors body Editors’ Council raised concerns about and objections to Sections 8, 21, 25, 28, 29, 31, 32, 43 and 53 of the bill saying that the sections posed serious threats to freedom of expression and media operation. Dhaka Reporters Unity raised objections to Sections 8, 32 and 43, terming them obstruction for working journalists’ professional freedom.
Bangladesh Federal Union of Journalists and Dhaka Union of Journalists factions said that the proposed law incorporated colonial Official Secrets Act 1923 and such a law was unimaginable in a civilised country.
Journalist leaders threatened tougher protests if objected sections remained in the proposed legislation that might curb freedom of media after the proposed discussion in the cabinet.