- Guard polling centres instead of boycotting election
- Paul Allen: Microsoft co-founder and billionaire dies aged 65
- Asia stocks at 17-month low as China lets yuan slip
- UK announces $22.25m support for Rohingya refugees
- IMF forecasts 7.1pc economic growth for Bangladesh in 2019
- Bangladesh ‘least committed’ to cut rich-poor gap: Oxfam
- Bhashani Univ suspends 5 BCL leaders ‘for misbehaving with teachers’
- NKorea hackers broke into banks, tried to take US$1.1b
- Oil spill threatens Meghna; unheeded for 5 days
- Haiti quake death toll rises to 15, and 300 injured
US senators in rebuke to Trump with Yemen vote
The US senate took a defiant stance against president Donald Trump's White House on Wednesday, advancing a measure that would end American military support for the Saudi-led intervention in Yemen.
Senators voted 63-37 in favour of the proposal just hours after secretary of state Mike Pompeo and defence secretary Jim Mattis had implored them not to curtail US assistance to the Saudi military, arguing that pulling back would worsen the war.
The vote was a striking departure from earlier this year, when the measure failed, and marks a new bipartisan desire in the senate for Trump's administration to take a harder line on Saudi Arabia.
Lawmakers are exasperated with Trump's reaction to the murder of dissident journalist Jamal Khashoggi, which has been linked to Riyadh, and by the mounting humanitarian crisis caused by the war in Yemen.
‘The Saudis have gone off the rails. They've killed more civilians this year than any year prior in the Yemen war,’ democratic senator Chris Murphy told AFP.
‘They obviously made a giant strategic error in abducting and murdering Jamal Khashoggi. So, a lot has changed in the last few months to get us to this point.’
Republican senator Lindsey Graham said he switched his vote in favour of the resolution because CIA director Gina Haspel did not testify and could not be grilled on whether Saudi crown prince Mohammed bin Salman was aware of the plan to kill Khashoggi.
‘The question for me is whether or not the CIA supports the conclusion, with a high degree of confidence, that the crown prince was complicit in the murder of Mr Khashoggi,’ Graham told reporters.
‘I'm not going to be denied the ability to be briefed by the CIA.’
Both Mattis and Pompeo said that, after carefully reviewing the intelligence, they could find no direct evidence linking Khashoggi's murder to the crown prince, who is also known as MBS.
‘There is no smoking gun,’ Mattis told Pentagon reporters, stressing he still believes those responsible should be punished.
‘We have not changed, that accountability for the murder is our expectation of everyone involved in the murder.’
Saudi Arabia has acknowledged the Washington post columnist, a US resident, was killed inside the kingdom's Istanbul consulate in October but has blamed his death on a ‘rogue’ operation.
Trump last week called Saudi Arabia a ‘steadfast partner’ and said it was unclear whether MBS was aware of the plan to kill Khashoggi.
He has also cast doubt on the CIA's reported conclusion that MBS was behind the killing.
Further debate and votes on the measure are expected next week.
Should it ultimately pass the senate it would have little chance of clearing the House this year. But extended debate could serve as a powerful symbolic step — and allow lawmakers to address alternative paths in US-Saudi relations.
Peace talks aimed at ending the war in Yemen have been set for early December in Sweden, between Huthi rebels and the UN-recognised government.
Mattis and Pompeo worry a move to cut US support to the Saudis ahead of the summit is poorly timed and could embolden Huthis not to negotiate.
Senator Murphy, however, said Pompeo and Mattis' testimony may have been counterproductive.
‘They lost votes this morning,’ he said.
‘They just had no good answers for why Gina Haspel wasn't there. They had no plan to end the war in Yemen.’
The Yemen conflict has triggered the world's worst humanitarian crisis, with the country now on the brink of famine.
The UN estimates as many as 10,000 people have died, most of them civilians, since the Saudi-led coalition launched military operations in 2015 in support of embattled Yemeni president Abedrabbo Mansour Hadi's government.
US military support for the coalition includes intelligence sharing and training pilots to avoid strikes that risk civilian casualties.
The Pentagon had also been conducting air-to-air refuelling for coalition aircraft, but this month said it was stopping doing so.
Still, a series of high-profile coalition strikes has killed scores of civilians, many of them children, and now many US politicians are balking at America's role in the war.
Aside from the motion to pull US military support, some lawmakers want to impose sanctions beyond those that Washington enacted on 17 Saudis allegedly involved in Khashoggi's killing.
Events have left administration officials publicly grappling with global realpolitik, saying Saudi Arabia's role in countering Iran is too important for the US to turn its back.
‘We are seldom free to work with unblemished partners,’ Mattis told senators.
‘Long-standing relationships guide but do not blind us. Saudi Arabia, due to geography and the Iranian threat, is fundamental to maintaining regional and Israeli security, and to our interest in Mideast stability.’
The Pentagon chief added that Saudi Arabia is a ‘necessary strategic partner’ and pointed to the US military's training of partner pilots as key in reducing deaths.
‘While tragedies occur in war, we assess restraint and improved tactical judgment by Arab coalition pilots has reduced the risk of civilian casualties,’ he said.
Pompeo warned lawmakers that ending US backing would lead to a stronger Iran, while reinvigorating both the Islamic state group and Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula.
‘Try defending that outcome back home,’ he said.