- PM to bid adieu 23 plane crash victims at Army Stadium
- Khaleda’s bail stayed till May 8 in graft case
- 1st janaza of 23 plane crash victims held in Nepal
- BNP to resist bid to hold lopsided polls, says Rizvi
- BNP stages demo protesting Milon’s death in custody
- DU teacher relieved of academic duties for assaulting fellow
- Govt mulling pvt sector`s participation in power transmission, distribution
- Rajshahi fresher fails to surface after falling into Padma
- Burglars loot ‘Tk 72 lakh’ from Unilever distributor’s office
- Youth gets life in prison for raping visually-impaired girl
After the silent coup in country’s largest private Bank, Islami Bank Bangladesh Limited, now Social Islami Bank Ltd.'s (SIBL) top brass resignations have left a bitter taste in the banking sector.
It came to the media that in a recent Annual General Meeting, bank's top three members of senior management, including the chairman had submitted their resignations and those resignations were accepted by the central bank in only a few hours after submission. Though none of these three officials were present in that program. Basically it was enforced resignation just to establish the authority of the same company which had taken control of IBBL couple of months back.
It is reported that the central bank worked at record speed to accept the resignations and issue no-objection certificates (NOC) which is in contravention of a BB circular (issued on December 23, 2014) that states that if the chief executive officer of a banking institution wishes to relieve himself of his responsibilities, he or she must give the board at least a one-month notice, along with reasons for resignation, that are supposed to be verified by BB.
It would seem that rules do not apply to certain banks. Because it is found earlier that BB went one step further and approved the appointment of the new managing director and issued a NOC on the same day. It is a perverted level of efficiency with which the central bank is operating these days!
It seems that the central bank has given in to pressure from the new majority shareholder of the bank. If we are to take this as the new normal in our country, where banking rules and regulations are made to be broken, then there is little hope of ensuring good financial governance in the sector.